Bryan

I agree with all of that.  What does that get us to?

Thanks

On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 3:03 PM Bryan Bende <[email protected]> wrote:

> I would vote to make nifi-flume-nar optional, and it looks like
> nifi-other-graph-services-nar might be new since last release, so
> since that is in the top 10 and not released yet, it might also be a
> good candidate (not downplaying the usefulness of anything in that
> NAR).
>
> I would also think we could consider the nifi-kafka-0-8-nar since
> Kafka 0.8 is quite old at this point, and we already have other Kafka
> NARs for 0.9, 0.10, 0.11, 1.0, and 2.0. Might even consider dropping a
> few more versions from default assembly.
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 2:45 PM Aldrin Piri <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Doing a recent PR review and build, it seems that master has amassed some
> > additional size since our 1.9.2 release approaching 200MB.
> >
> > Unfortunately, this is problematic and needs to be addressed in advance
> of
> > our 1.10 release.  INFRA has been more than helpful making one off
> > exceptions [1][2] for the larger assembly to get published to the ASF
> > repository and its associated mirrors, but another release that is even
> > larger is not something we can allow.  In a Linux environment, the master
> > build reports in at 1575671276 which puts us over the hard limit
> > highlighted in [2].
> >
> > We had a prior community discussion [3] about splitting the framework and
> > extension repos and I am hoping to revive that discussion, in part.  We
> > certainly know what our longer term goals and ambitions are but need a
> fix
> > in the interim.  In the current state, we will not be able to make our
> > convenience binaries available at the conclusion of the release process.
> >
> > At minimum we should evaluate which bundles are eligible to get treated
> as
> > optional dependencies and only enabled via profile, much like the work
> that
> > has occurred surrounding some of our other, hefty NARs. [4] A listing of
> > the top 50 largest NARs, excluding framework and standard, is available
> in
> > a gist [5].  The nifi-media-nar looks to be a good initial candidate for
> > exclusion.
> >
> > Thanks for your consideration!
> >
> > --aldrin
> >
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11252
> > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-15816
> > [3]
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/939a7630a2e32594cd10444e48b7a1321fd9ce51834d911a8c04b6a9@
> <dev.nifi.apache.org>
> > [4]
> >
> https://github.com/apache/nifi/blob/master/nifi-assembly/pom.xml#L807-L875
> > [5] https://gist.github.com/apiri/4d9a02f9f6b46867b601956df83b6d8c
>

Reply via email to