That makes sense to me.

I think going forward we should consider switching things around a little
bit and get master back to the state of 0.6.0 and set it to 0.7.0-SNAPSHOT,
and then keep the 1.0.0 work in another branch, mainly because it is
unclear when we would be able to release a 1.0.0 registry which likely
requires a 2.0.0 NiFi.

We can figure this out after finalizing the 0.6.0 release, so for now what
you suggested seems like the correct thing to do.

On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 9:52 AM Arpad Boda <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> As you may know, 0.6.0 was technically a patch release, branching from
> master based on 0.5.0 and cherry-picking non-breaking changes from master.
>
> Because of this merging back the release branch to master would just cause
> conflict and master has the proper versions (1.0.0) already set.
>
> To avoid this issue I would just add the release tag to 0.6.0 branch and
> avoid merging.
>
> Please share your opinion, especially in case you have concerns with the
> above.
>
> Cheers,
> Arpad
>

Reply via email to