"To allow the community some time to finalize the API, I would not rush 1.0 right after 0.8, unless we see that the API is stable and something we can commit to."
+1 to that On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 10:28 AM Marton Szasz <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > +1. There are countless fixes and stability improvements on the main > development branch that would benefit the majority of users. > > Breaking changes: there are some minor API breakages compared to 0.7, but > there was an effort to avoid breaking core APIs and the configuration > syntax. > > I agree with Marc that we should allow ourselves more freedom to fix issues > even at the cost of breaking APIs, especially before 1.0. To allow the > community some time to finalize the API, I would not rush 1.0 right after > 0.8, unless we see that the API is stable and something we can commit to. > > Thanks, regards, > Marton > > On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 at 17:36, Marc Parisi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 to 0.8.0. Been keeping up with changes and I think the progress is > > great. > > > > In my opinion the breaking changes are long coming and probably would be > > appreciated by the community. > > > > Arpad are you thinking of going to 1.x? You're discussing 0.8, but is > there > > any reason to not jump to 1.x after that? > > > > Thanks, > > Marc > > > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 10:12 AM Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Arpad > > > > > > Yep makes sense. Frankly the 0. versioning gives the flexibility to do > > > these breaking changes during this stage of the lifecycle. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 7:06 AM Arpad Boda <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hey, > > > > > > > > Quite a lot of time has passed since the last release and also a lot > of > > > > improvements and bug fixes have been made (Memleaks fixed, new > > > threadpool, > > > > some new processors, etc), so I think it's time for a new release. > > > > > > > > Another important aspect would be the release of the current state of > > the > > > > source before introducing some breaking changes - which seems to be > > > > necessary at this point. > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > Thanks, regards, > > > > Arpad > > > > > > > > > >
