Javi, Yes! This is a great idea. It is the sweat equity behind it that needs to happen. I can guarantee you there is significant interest/desire to do this or something like it.
Thanks On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 8:01 AM Russell Bateman <r...@windofkeltia.com> wrote: > > Javi, > > Don't despair. Could just be that folk are busy and haven't had time to > reflect upon it. > > > On 3/23/21 11:55 PM, Javi Roman wrote: > > I see that it has not been well received, I thought it would be a good idea > > :-( > > > > -- > > Javi Roman > > > > Twitter: @javiromanrh > > GitHub: github.com/javiroman > > Linkedin: es.linkedin.com/in/javiroman > > Big Data Blog: dataintensive.info > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 6:44 AM Javi Roman <jroman.espi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi! > >> > >> I'm not sure whether this topic has been discussed in the past. I would > >> like to open a thread talking about the possibility of creating a kind of > >> market of NiFi Processors, for third-party processors. > >> > >> I'm thinking about something similar to Kubernetes Helm hub [1], or > >> Kubernetes Operators Hub [2], but for NiFi processors (NAR bundles). > >> > >> This repository could be managed by NiFi Registry in order to use > >> processors in different stages of development (preview, stable, official > >> ... and so forth). > >> > >> This is a way of slimming down the NiFi image and opening the development > >> to new users. > >> > >> It would also be interesting to discuss if this "processors market" could > >> be hosted in ASF resources. > >> > >> What do you think? > >> > >> [1] https://artifacthub.io/ > >> [2] https://operatorhub.io/ > >> -- > >> Javi Roman > >> > >> Twitter: @javiromanrh > >> GitHub: github.com/javiroman > >> Linkedin: es.linkedin.com/in/javiroman > >> Big Data Blog: dataintensive.info > >> >
