Thanks for the comments.  Regarding the stale PR management I'll
proceed with what I suggested in the earlier email hopefully sometime
in the next couple of days.  Thanks

On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 12:21 PM Chris Sampson
<chris.samp...@naimuri.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> Somewhat related... would there be benefit in labeling PRs [1] to group
> them for people to more easily identify changes they may be more
> comfortable in reviewing?
>
> For example, I've submitted several Elasticsearch related PRs that are
> awaiting review (and would be relatively happy trying to review similar),
> but I'd be less confident in reviewing something related to Hadoop, for
> example.
>
> Such labels would allow people to quickly filter for things related to the
> areas in which they're interested/confident to review.
>
> Of course, this would need someone to add labels to existing PRs and maybe
> a request for people to add them to new PRs could be part of the PR
> template?
>
>
> [1]
> https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/managing-labels
>
> Cheers,
>
> Chris Sampson
>
> On Thu, 25 Mar 2021, 20:47 Joe Witt, <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Got ya
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 1:36 PM Otto Fowler <ottobackwa...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/Git+-+.asf.yaml+features
> > > What I mean is, beyond the GitHub settings it has, if it offered PR
> > pruning
> > > ( if that were possible ).
> > > Seems silly that everyone has to roll their own.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 3:05 PM Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Otto
> > > >
> > > > I'm not clear on what you mean.  But here we're talking about our
> > > > communities usage of Github in particular as a convenient vehicle to
> > > > support contributions.  The ASF/Git (gitbox) is a different animal.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 12:02 PM Otto Fowler <ottobackwa...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > What would be nice is if this could be part of the ASF official .yml
> > for
> > > > git
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 2:42 PM Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Team,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We've discussed it in various forums but I want to formally move to
> > > > > > taking action on our PR situation.  As of a couple hours ago we had
> > > > > > 280 or so open PRs.  Many many many of these are quite old (two or
> > > > > > more years).  These aren't just abandoned PRs because they were not
> > > > > > good enough to be clear.  There are actually a lot of good and
> > > > > > interesting things in here.  I think though we simply cannot keep
> > up
> > > > > > with the PRs that come in.  The most difficult appear to be less
> > about
> > > > > > fixing bugs and more on adding features.  Anyway, we clearly get a
> > lot
> > > > > > of PRs and we clearly close a lot of PRs but many remain
> > unaddressed.
> > > > > > Other communities such as Apache Spark [1],[2] have provided an
> > auto
> > > > > > close mechanism.  It is intended to keep the PR queue tidy and not
> > > > > > just go endlessly without a response.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am planning to implement the same with a 180 day
> > auto-stale/closure
> > > > > > using the same github/ci workflow [3] based on github action [4].
> > You
> > > > > > can see the results of this here [5].
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If someone disagrees please share a workable alternative that
> > doesn't
> > > > > > leave the PRs or those that submitted them hanging indefinitely
> > which
> > > > > > you are willing to implement.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1]
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/Handling-stale-PRs-td8015i20.html#a9684
> > > > > > [2]
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/Closing-stale-PRs-with-a-GitHub-Action-td28477.html
> > > > > > [3]
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/.github/workflows/stale.yml
> > > > > > [4] https://github.com/marketplace/actions/close-stale-issues
> > > > > > [5]
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > https://github.com/apache/spark/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aclosed+label%3AStale
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > Joe
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >

Reply via email to