Thanks for kicking off the discussion Joe!

Of the many items that could be included in the next release, securing the
default configuration as described in NIFI-8220
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-8220> would be great to have
completed.  Most of the elements are in place, and the current Pull Request
for NIFI-8516 <https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/5068> is under review.
If there are any other achievable items that should be included as part of
a secure default installation for NiFi, it would be helpful to add
sub-tasks to NIFI-8220.  The current scope is limited to a standalone
installation, so issues regarding clustered deployments can be handled
separately.  If others are interested in evaluating the proposed new
default configuration that requires HTTPS and leverages a generated
username and password, feel free to provide feedback on NIFI-8516.

Regards,
David Handermann

On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 6:51 PM Otto Fowler <ottobackwa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think NIFI-8625 and NIFI-8461 need to be understood and addressed.
>
>
> > On May 27, 2021, at 13:29, Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Team,
> >
> > There has been a tremendous amount of work already on the 1.14 line as
> shown:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NIFI/versions/12349644
> >
> > These include merging the nifi registry and minifi java into the nifi
> > line itself.  So when we release these things stay in sync and
> > maintained.  The release will now produce things like Apache NiFi, the
> > Apache NiFi toolkit, Apache NiFi Registry, and Apache NiFi MiNiFi Java
> > and the Apache NiFi stateless runtime as well.  There have been many
> > improvements to core nifi and stateless nifi now meaning we have the
> > traditional execution form factor and this new stateless mode.  We can
> > now hot load nars from HDFS storage locations which could mean HDFS,
> > blob storage in the cloud, etc..  There is a lot more.
> >
> > Anyway, I wanted to start circling the wagons for a 1.14 release.  I'm
> > happy to take on RM duties especially since there will be new elements
> > to the release process.
> >
> > Thanks
>
>

Reply via email to