Hi Pierre, Thanks for you feedback. We will start to prepare the pull request.
Best Regards, Andrés > El 9 sept 2021, a las 10:16, Pierre Villard <[email protected]> > escribió: > > I don't see any issue for you to create pull requests and to start > discussions to engage with the community. The main issue, I think, will be > to find reviewers able to spend some time testing your contributions. > Please make sure there are easy instructions on how to test your code, etc. > You'll also need to add a specific Maven profile for these extensions, we > cannot afford additional components in the default binary (due to ASF > constraints) but the NARs would still be built and published to Maven > repositories. > > Thanks, > Pierre > > Le mer. 8 sept. 2021 à 17:55, Andres UPM <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> Hi Pierre, >> >> Thanks for your response. One of the goals that we can achieve by the use >> of NGSI-LD standard is that the users can automate the process of storage. >> By using this processor, the users only need to configure some parameters, >> regarding the connection to the database and leaving to the processor the >> task to create the database, tables, and columns according to the >> guidelines provided by the NGSI-LD standard. I understand that make this >> for one specific database is not the best option. However, we have a set of >> processors for dealing with other databases, SQL and NoSQL but keeping the >> same data structure in where the data will be stored. >> >> With this approach, many users that have implementations using this >> standard can use NiFi to store context data in multiple databases without >> regarding in define a specific data structure for their application. >> >> I have known that FIWARE community is very interested in contributing to >> this development. Can we start a discussion over this topic?. >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Andrés >> >> >> >>> El 8 sept 2021, a las 13:29, Pierre Villard <[email protected]> >> escribió: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I just had a quick look and you propose a processor that is receiving the >>> notifications and sending the data into Postgres. Instead, isn't it >> better >>> to leverage NiFi to receive the notifications, turn these into FlowFiles >>> and let users decide what processors they should use next? This way they >>> could send the data into many databases, not just Postgres. Or is there a >>> reason that makes the data very specific to databases? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Pierre >>> >>> Le mar. 7 sept. 2021 à 09:40, Andres UPM <[email protected]> a >> écrit : >>> >>>> Hello there, >>>> >>>> I am talking on behalf of the New Generation Internet Research gropu of >>>> Universidad Politécnica de Madrid and as member of FIWARE Community. In >> the >>>> last years, we have been working on custom NiFi's processors for >> providing >>>> NGSI-LD support for data persistence in different storage systems. We >>>> already have many processors ready for this purpose and we have the >>>> intention to contribute these developments to NiFi project. We have >> created >>>> the ticket in Jira NIFI-8472 < >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-8472> with more information >>>> about it. It is possible that we can start a discussion for analyzing >> the >>>> possibility of contributing this code? >>>> >>>> BR, >>>> >>>> Andrés Muñoz >> >>
