Sounds like a great time to cut a new release.

On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 7:32 AM Gábor Gyimesi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Sounds good to me as well!
>
> Thanks,
> Gabor
>
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 at 15:27, Ferenc Gerlits <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Yes, it's definitely time for a new release, and 0.11.0 sounds good.
> > Thanks for RMing!
> >
> > Ferenc
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 12:09 PM Marton Szasz <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > I agree that it's time for a new release, thank you for taking the RM
> > > duties. I'm not aware of any blockers at the moment.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Marton
> > >
> > > On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 at 10:28, Adam Debreceni <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi community,
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to initiate a discussion about the next release of MiNiFi C++.
> > > The
> > > > last release was five months ago, and there have been many new
> > features,
> > > > bug fixes and stability improvements committed to the development
> > branch
> > > > since.
> > > > I would be happy to take on RM duties for this release.
> > > >
> > > > New features since the 0.10.0 release:
> > > > - new processors:
> > > >    * AttributesToJson
> > > >    * DefragmentText
> > > >    * PutAzureDataLakeStorage
> > > >    * ReplaceText
> > > >    * RouteText
> > > > - support for funnels
> > > > - shared rocksdb repository
> > > > - repository encryption (flow-file, content)
> > > > - support for Azure managed identity
> > > > - modularization of extensions
> > > > - ConsumeKafka security protocol
> > > > - platform independent AppendHostInfo
> > > > - agent configuration checksum in the c2 heartbeat
> > > >
> > > > We now use C++17 throughout the codebase and C++20 wherever possible.
> > > >
> > > > The core API is still not mature enough to be able to commit to it, so
> > > > in line with previous discussions I suggest releasing it as 0.11.0.
> > > >
> > > > Do you agree it is time for a new release?  Are there any blockers that
> > > we
> > > > should definitely include in this release?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Adam
> > >
> >

Reply via email to