For sure many thanks.  Getting stable builds and keeping them there is
key.  And supporting the newer JVMs in a timely manner is as well.

Thanks!

On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 8:51 AM Kevin Doran <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks for your contributions David, Mike, and Paul! These are all great
> updates.
>
> On Mar 17, 2022 at 15:04:32, David Handermann <[email protected]
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Development Team,
> >
> > Thanks to reviews from Mike Thomsen and Paul Grey, support for building
> the
> > NiFi project on Java 17 is now in the main branch.
> >
> > The GitHub continuous integration workflow now includes a fourth
> > environment:
> >
> > Ubuntu Zulu JDK 17 EN
> >
> > Although some dependencies may cause runtime issues with Java 17, this
> new
> > build target will help highlight and correct particular issues. For the
> > purpose of compatibility, restricted reflective access is one of the most
> > important differences in Java 17.  Java 11 flags these issues as illegal
> > reflective access warnings, but Java 17 prevents these operations.
> >
> > New issues with particular components should be flagged and addressed
> using
> > the standard Jira tracking process.
> >
> > This is also a good time to mention ongoing work related to JUnit 5. Big
> > thanks to Mike Thomsen for working through numerous modules and multiple
> > rounds of feedback to update a majority of components to JUnit 5! All new
> > test code should use JUnit 5 org.junit.jupiter components.  Some work
> still
> > remains to convert various modules, which can be tracked through
> sub-tasks
> > under the following Jira issue:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-9084
> >
> > Finally, shout out to Paul Grey for his efforts to improve the
> reliability
> > of the NiFi system tests on GitHub.  The resource-constrained GitHub
> > runners can expose test stability problems that are difficult to track
> > down, but thanks to Paul's work, the stability of the system tests on
> > GitHub has improved.
> >
> > Regards,
> > David Handermann
> >
>

Reply via email to