Mike There are some threads in Apache land how such a thing can happen for binary dependencies and only for purely optional modules someone else might choose to build.
However, the cleanest option given we are talking about a designed extension point is to likely just build it and make it available on github and such. Thanks On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 8:22 AM Mike Thomsen <mikerthom...@gmail.com> wrote: > I know the official binaries cannot contain Category X license code, > but is it allowable to have optional build profiles that integrate > Category X licensed code? An example scenario that lead me to wonder > if this is doable is I would like to try to add optional support for > Elastic's Painless as script engine, but it's covered under a Category > X license. > > Thanks, > > Mike >
