+1 from me, it seems like a good time for the next release of MiNiFi C++ On Apr 3, 2023 at 07:34:44, Gábor Gyimesi <gamezb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi community, > > I'd like to initiate a discussion about the next release of MiNiFi C++. The > last release was almost four months ago, and there have been many new > features, > bug fixes and stability improvements committed to the development branch > since then: 74 tickets closed, over 80 commits as of today. > > I would be happy to take on RM duties for this release. > > Notable features and improvements since the 0.14.0 release: > > - Several improvements on repository resource handling > * Periodically run RocksDB repository compaction+1 > * Add compression options for RocksDB repositories > * Add synchronous flow file reloading > * Retry failed removals of unused resources > - Use Python stable ABI to support all libraries above Python 3.2+ for > Python processors > - Add ProcessSession::remove to Python and Lua API > - Add support for JSON flow configuration format with option to generate > JSON schema locally > - Add support for reverseDnsLookup in expression language > - Fix most issues for ARM64 support > - Improve performance of ListFile processor > - Add cache SID lookups in ConsumeWindowsEventLog processor > - Add default connection size limits of 2000 queue size and 100MB of queue > data size > - Add support for MQTT 5 (mistakenly advertised for 0.13.0 release) > - Add failure relationship to SQL processors > - Add support for new AWS regions > - Add option to select processor metrics with regular expressions > - Add the UUID to the end of Processor and Controller Service log lines > - Make GetFile path attributes consistent with other processors > - Fix leaks and file lock issues on Windows > - Fix crashing in python processors > > The core API is still not mature enough to be able to commit to it, so > in line with previous discussions I suggest releasing it as 0.14.0. > > Do you agree it is time for a new release? Are there any blockers that we > should definitely include in this release? > > Thanks, > Gabor >
