In my opinion that's ok, but I think it would be helpful if a PR is going to be backported to support/nifi-1.x that the PR author provides two PRs, one against main with Java 17 features and one against support/nifi-1.x with Java 8 features. That being said, allowing Java 17 features may make maintenance tougher while there's an active 1.x branch. Maybe we should wait until we only support NiFi 2.x?
On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 4:59 PM Mike Thomsen <mikerthom...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Since we're standardizing on 17, we're free and clear to use Java 17 > features, right?
