Yeah sorry - what I wrote for the Hive one was a bit nonsensical.  I tried
to clarify it better in the JIRA.

Thanks

On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 12:38 PM Matt Burgess <mattyb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> For [1]  Hive 3 was removed in
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-12981, if you mean the Hive
> dependency from Apache Iceberg we probably need a release from them that
> brings in Hive 4 dependencies? Or do you suggest we bring the Hive
> components back as long as we update the version?
>
> I'll take the Flyway one in the meantime, database integrations are my
> blessing and my curse :) If that goes more smoothly than I expect I can
> grab the QuestDB one too, will update the Jiras as appropriate.
>
> Regards,
> Matt
>
> On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 1:56 PM Joe Witt <joew...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Team,
> >
> > We have made massive strides going from thousands of out of date
> libraries
> > to dozens in the 2.x line vs any prior releases.  And we can/should stay
> on
> > top of these better going forward.  A few key bits that are outstanding
> > with no obvious immediate work underway are as follows.  If anyone is
> > working on these, willing to work on these, please volunteer and let us
> > know.  For components that we cannot find active engagement on we should
> > consider removal though these aren't great examples as they're indeed
> > common usage components.
> >
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13173
> > Hive 4 recently came out but Hive also gives us some of the most
> > complicated POM/library mangling and oldest dependencies to
> override/etc..
> > Putting serious detailed focus here is very valuable from a maintenance
> > point of view.  While existing usage of Hive 3 likely remains for some
> > time, those users are like NiFi 1.x users anyway.  In any case if there
> are
> > motivated developers interested to see our Hive components be healthy
> > please do dive in on this.
> >
> > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13169
> > The NiFI registry is a major release behind Flyway DB.  We need to stay
> > current given the importance of this component.
> >
> > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13168
> > We are a few incrementals behind and a minor release behind QuestDB.  I
> > tried bumping the incremental but it broke tests.
> >
> > [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-11686
> > We are a full major release behind and several incremental/minors as
> well.
> > Apparently there is some concern related to the community changes in
> > Elastic vs OpenSearch/etc.. but regardless we need to stay active in
> > maintaining this component.  We really should get to the latest main.
> >
> > Thanks to anyone who can help tackle these and make progress both in
> terms
> > of doing the upgrade/update work, validating tests, fixing licenses, but
> > also reviews.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Joe
> >
>

Reply via email to