Marton

I strongly support this. The path needs to be maintainable and keeping
things around that dont get the love create many challenges.

Thanks

On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 7:48 AM Marton Szasz <sza...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi community,
>
> We're considering to drop certain features from MiNiFi C++ that seem to
> be unused, and not worth maintaining. If you would like to keep some of
> them, please share your opinion and your use case for them!
>
> To be removed:
> 1. CoAP C2: not used anywhere as far as I'm aware, and not well
> maintained. C2 over HTTP would remain unchanged.
> 2. nanofi: This was an initiative around 2019-2020 to rewrite about half
> of minifi in a C library form for integration to other software. There
> was no development on it since early 2020, and I'm not aware of any users.
> 3. pcap extension: not well tested or maintained, probably not used by
> anyone
> 4. usb camera extension: same as pcap
> 5. sensors extension: same as pcap
> 6. openwsman extension: same as pcap
>
> As we progress towards the new major versions, now is our best
> opportunity to remove unused code, so the codebase becomes easier to
> maintain, and this hopefully unlocks new feature possibilities. Let me
> know what you think!
>
> Thanks,
> Marton
>
>

Reply via email to