+1 (binding) Cheers,
--- *Chris Sampson* Technical Lead, Solution Architect, Principal Software Engineer Naimuri Click here to join our newsletter <https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdkOWwC2zWL_vW0mlaoNl0RsbLvvvRi3R1L7V9DhcmRMlNmHw/viewform> On Mon, 12 May 2025 at 19:58, Ferenc Kis <briansolo1...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 8:15 PM Arpad Boda <ab...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > +1 (bindig) > > > > BTW here is the original discuss thread, just to have it referenced from > > the vote thread: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/olj268h722pp913yo6w71od5blwob3lc > > > > Cheers, > > Arpad > > > > On Thu, May 8, 2025 at 4:56 PM Bryan Bende <bbe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > On Thu, May 8, 2025 at 10:24 AM Michael Moser <moser...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > The [1] URL was missing from your email, it's below. > > > > > > > > When building the Epic, please include a Jira to update the > system-tests. > > > > > > > > [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIP-1 > > > > > > > > -- Mike > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 5:26 PM Matt Burgess <mattyb...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > All, > > > > > > > > > > I would like to call a vote for NIP-1 [1] to add a > > > VerifiableRegistryClient > > > > > interface to verify Registry Client implementations. I can't find > the > > > > > DISCUSS thread in the archive but there was a reply from Bryan > Bende > > > on Oct > > > > > 8, 2024, quoted here: > > > > > > > > > > "It seems like a reasonable change to me and would be a nice > > > > > improvement for the user experience when configuring registry > clients. > > > > > > > > > > It might be worth noting that although the change to nifi-api is > just > > > > > one new interface with one method, there is a significant amount of > > > > > framework level work to make it usable in NiFi. I believe it would > > > > > require.... > > > > > - New REST end-points in ControllerResource for submitting and > > > > > checking async verification requests for registry clients > > > > > - The service layer code that performs the handles the async > > > verification > > > > > - UI work on the registry client config screen to call the new REST > > > > > API and show results > > > > > - The implementation of verify for any existing registry clients in > > > > > the codebase that choose to provide it > > > > > > > > > > I don't see any issues with implementing any of the above, but just > > > > > wanted to make sure everyone is on the same page about what is > > > > > involved to fully implement the feature." > > > > > > > > > > If the vote is successful I will create the Epic and associated > Jiras > > > in > > > > > the NIFI project for all the work needed. > > > > > > > > > > I'm a +1 (binding) :) > > > > > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > >
