+1 from me, please pass through to any vote. Thanks, Matt
On Fri, Aug 8, 2025 at 10:27 AM David Handermann < exceptionfact...@apache.org> wrote: > Pierre, > > Thanks for proposing this improvement to state handling, I am in favor > of the proposal. > > In many cases, Processors and Controller Services should retain > complete control over the State Map, as they may expect multiple keys > to exist based on previous invocations. In other cases, however, where > the State Map is more of a collection of unique items, selective > removal seems reasonable. Introducing the new property on the > annotation provides a clear way for a component to declare the type of > expected behavior, serving as a foundation for supported operations > through the UI or REST API. > > Regards, > David Handermann > > On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 1:46 PM Pierre Villard <pvill...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I just submitted a NIP [1] to discuss a feature proposal that would > > introduce a backward compatible API change in order to support the > > possibility for dropping individual keys in the component state. > > Please check the JIRA for more details and feel free to comment there, > > or on this thread, with your thoughts / feedback. > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIP-9 > > > > Thanks, > > Pierre >
