Thanks, all. In the absence of any objections, I’ll consider the lazy consensus vote to ratify NIP-44 successfully closed.
Thanks! -Mark > On Aug 28, 2026, at 9:09 PM, Matt Burgess <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2026 at 11:43 AM Mark Payne <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Team, >> >> I'd like to start a lazy-consensus vote [1] for NIP-44 [2], which proposes >> allowing a Stateless Process Group to optionally buffer FlowFile content in >> memory instead of writing it to the configured Content Repository. The >> default would remain writing to the Content Repository; in-memory buffering >> would be opt-in for cases where the flow keeps little data in flight or the >> instance is dedicated to that group. >> >> Per our NIP voting policy, this is proposed as a 72-hour vote. I'll leave >> this open for 72 hours, and if nobody objects I will consider the NIP >> approved. >> >> The actual PR/code change will still go through our normal RTC process. >> >> Thanks >> - Mark >> >> [1] https://apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIP-44 >>
