Yep, saw that and the plan for that sounds good. Jenn, are all the up-to-date docs a part of develop or are you aware of any additional items outstanding beyond NIFI-422? Looking through tickets under the documentation component, I saw you provided a patch there and the ticket remains open.
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Matt Gilman <[email protected]> wrote: > Aldrin, > > Just a heads up if you didn't see the other email thread but I have been I > touch with INFRA so we should be able to transition to the updated site > soon. I will send out another note as we progress. > > Matt > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Mar 28, 2015, at 8:14 AM, Jennifer Barnabee < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > +1 on your reshuffling proposals. > > > > The documentation currently on the site is not up-to-date. I have to > admit > > that I don't know how to post up the most recent docs myself. Are there > > instructions somewhere? > > > > -Jenn > > > >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:53 PM, Aldrin Piri <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> I am looking at tackling documentation issues and found the current > split > >> of everything to be redundant and a bit scattered at points. For the > sake > >> of illustration, consider the menu categories on the home page > >> Documentation, Community, and Development. > >> > >> What I propose is a cleaner delineation between subjects. Some of this > is > >> mere semantics and consistency, but I think helps to give a clearer > >> picture. > >> > >> High level, I think our guides should be more tailored toward the > community > >> and contributions. > >> > >> Accordingly, I think the NiFi Developer's guide needs to be viewed more > as > >> a manual. A minor distinction, but I see this provided to users who may > >> extend the software without necessarily contributing back. > >> > >> How does this manifest itself? Mostly just some reshuffling. > >> > >> * Documentation > >> This largely remains the same, but the Developer Guide's segments > >> pertaining to contribution should be moved out. Let the Developer Guide > >> focus on the core technical matters. In its current form, the > contributor > >> items feel out of place. > >> > >> * Community > >> We've had some great contributions between blog posts and videos, but > there > >> is no way to showcase these short of searching across social media. I > >> would advocate for a page that highlights these items. > >> > >> * Development > >> The new home for the contributor's guide for development and additional > >> guides as needed, such as documentation. > >> >
