Sergio Am really happy you think so. Was just waiting to get through the release before having that discussion.
Do others feel that we are at the point to start that as well? Thanks Joe On May 15, 2015 12:21 PM, "Sergio Fernández" <[email protected]> wrote: > Have you thought about graduating as TLP? FMPOV the project has > demonstrated enough maturity level to, at least, discuss it. > On May 15, 2015 4:29 AM, "Joe Witt" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > All, > > > > With the 0.1.0 release hopefully soon available it is time to turn > > towards the next release or so and get a sense of what we should focus > > on. > > > > This should include both 0.1.x but also 0.2.0. > > > > Obviously first and foremost we need to work the existing PRs and > > patches that exist. > > > > Beyond that we have slated the following so far: > > > > 0.1.1 > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI/fixforversion/12332286/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:version-summary-panel > > > > 0.2.0 > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI/fixforversion/12329653/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:version-summary-panel > > > > But what i'd like to throw out for general discussion is what are some > > of the bigger thematic things we should focus on? Things which will > > help further with community growth and utility of the product for > > those folks using it now? > > > > For example: > > I'd like to see us start digging into the cluster robustness issues > > (HA cluster manager w/ legit leader election, etc..). But there are > > other things as well that may be more important sooner. > > > > Please share your thoughts as this is a great time to effect those > > releases. > > > > Thanks > > Joe > > >
