Sean Sorry meant to reply two days ago. My own preference is to wait until the kinks are ironed out unless current use of the workaround helps with the ironing out of those kinks.
Do you need that help or have it in hand? Thanks Joe On May 21, 2015 11:50 AM, "Sean Busbey" <[email protected]> wrote: > bump? > > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Heya folks! > > > > Last week I worked through using the Hadoop Precommit Patch Tester to > > evaluate NiFi patches[1]. > > > > Most of the edges have been sanded down. There is still one outstanding > > major change that's needed to deal with NiFi's multi-project repo layout > > [2]. That fix is more involved, because it's providing a major boost in > the > > flexibility of the precommit framework (yay!) so I'm not sure when it's > > going to land. > > > > I have a work around for that particular issue for the specifics of > NiFi's > > layout[3]. However, it is definitely not what will be in the version that > > is committed and the way NiFi hooks into the test framework will be > > different once things settle. > > > > Would folks prefer to wait for the fix before using the precommit tester > > or run on top of my workaround for now (changing once the fix lands)? > > > > > > [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-577 > > > > [2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11929 > > > > [3]: https://github.com/busbey/hadoop/commits/NIFI-577 > > > > > > -- > > Sean > > > > > > -- > Sean >
