Aaron Radzinski created NLPCRAFT-179:
----------------------------------------
Summary: Fix license header/comment per mentor's suggestions.
Key: NLPCRAFT-179
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NLPCRAFT-179
Project: NLPCraft
Issue Type: Task
Components: server
Reporter: Aaron Radzinski
Assignee: Aaron Radzinski
Fix For: 0.7.3
{color:#222222}For files like NCBlowfishHasher.java, (correctly mentioned in
LICENSE and{color}
{color:#222222}NOTICE, thanks) if the statement "Code almost entirely based on
work of{color}
{color:#222222}..." is indeed true, then I believe it is usually clearer to
leave the{color}
{color:#222222}original license header in the source file and perhaps amend
with{color}
{color:#222222}"Subsequent changes Copyright by the NLPCraft team and made
under the{color}
{color:#222222}ASLv2..." but what you have is possibly okay - just not as
clear. IANAL,{color}
{color:#222222}but my understanding is that you have the obligation to make it
clear that{color}
{color:#222222}the requirements the original author requested for use of that
file in{color}
{color:#222222}source form etc. are still in play and aren't overwritten by
slapping the{color}
{color:#222222}ASLv2 header at the front of the file.{color}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
