[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NLPCRAFT-247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17287331#comment-17287331
]
Gleb edited comment on NLPCRAFT-247 at 2/19/21, 7:57 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------
Looks like a good feature to have.
Maybe 1. could be defined as
{{{A[0-3]} x}}
Also, 2 could be
{{{A}?}}
I think it's more natural to make regex-like definitions
was (Author: ifropc):
Looks like a good feature to have.
Maybe 1. could be defined as *{A[0-3]}x* ?
Also, 2 could be *{A}?*
I think it's more natural to make regex-like definitions
> Synonyms DSL improvements.
> --------------------------
>
> Key: NLPCRAFT-247
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NLPCRAFT-247
> Project: NLPCraft
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: probe
> Reporter: Sergey Kamov
> Assignee: Aaron Radzinski
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 0.7.5
>
>
> Synonyms DSL improvements.
> 1) Add quantifiers for synonyms
> Now we have to write following if we want to add synonyms for x and 1, 2 or 3
> A before
> x|A x|A A x|A A A x
> Let's define it as \{A[0, 3]|*} x
> If will be useful if A defined via nested elements
> 2) \{A|*} x - means `A x` or `x` (* indicates that A is optional 0 ..1)
> it is suitable symbols ? I guess it can be confused with intents quantifiers
> (* means [0, ∞])?
> What do you think?
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
