+1 for IDL Regards, Sergey
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 11:17 AM Kamov Sergey <[email protected]> wrote: > > I like `NLPCraft IDL` (focus on the same brand + abbreviation has > sense, it is short) > > > Regards, > > Sergey > > On 16.03.2021 01:22, Aaron Radzinski wrote: > > NLPCraft-ers, > > I would like to propose to name our DSL with a dedicated name vs. just a > > "intent DSL" or "synonym DSL" as we are doing right now. As this DSL > > becomes more sophisticated and more functional it is becoming a central > > part of NLPCraft and hence deserves a better "branding". It will also help > > to have a shorter, memorable name in conversations when talking about > > NLPCraft and how it works. > > > > I'll throw in some of the names that I find suitable to begin but I'll > > appreciate the feedback on the idea overall and some name proposals, if you > > agree. > > > > Proposed names for Intent DSL: > > - "Lingo" language > > - "Lingvo" language > > - "Craftling" language > > - "NLPcraft" language(why not the same name?) > > - "Onto" language > > - "Chatter" language > > - "Tokn" language (play on "token" word) > > - "Lesk" language (after Lesk Algorithm) > > - "Lexr" language (play on "lexer" word) > > - "Textr" language (play on "text" word) > > - "IDL" language (Intent Definition Language) > > - "Lemma" language > > > > Thoughts, ideas? > > -- > > Aaron Radzinski > >
