Sure - note that HOCON is just a human-readable JSON with a few
relaxed rules (like comments, includes, etc.)

Best,
--
Nikita Ivanov

On Sat, Aug 7, 2021 at 7:04 PM Rahul Padmanabhan
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the clarification. I wasn’t aware of this (or about what HOCON is) 
> until now. This helps me out a lot.
>
> -Rahul
>
> Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
> ________________________________
> From: Nikita Ivanov <[email protected]>
> Sent: Saturday, August 7, 2021 9:46:50 PM
> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Conf File Format Change
>
> Hi Rahul,
> Let me quickly chime in on this.
>
> NLPCraft uses HOCON format [1]. There's also a well maintained Python
> reader for HOCON [2] available. Generally, HOCON is a better option
> for configuration, while JSON/XML is better for general data
> serialization.
>
> Hope this helps,
> --
> Nikita Ivanov
>
> 1. https://github.com/lightbend/config
> 2. https://github.com/chimpler/pyhocon
>
> On Sat, Aug 7, 2021 at 5:52 PM Rahul Padmanabhan
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hello NLPCrafters,
> >
> > I came across this issue while working on 
> > NLPCRAFT-394<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NLPCRAFT-394> when I 
> > wanted to add configurable values to the python setup.
> >
> > The current "conf" files (nlpcraft.conf and application.conf) are not in a 
> > JSON/YAML/XML format. This makes it a little more of an effort when you 
> > want to read/parse the file from a different language (in my case, Python). 
> > In my opinion, having them in JSON/YAML/XML will be better for the ease of 
> > interaction with other languages and would be a more standardized format.
> >
> > For reference, other projects like Hadoop/Ignite etc. largely use XML files.
> >
> > Since we will be catering to developers, I think that it would better to 
> > provide a standardized format so that it is not only easier to configure 
> > but also, ensures simple interoperability across languages. I don't know 
> > how much of an effort a change like this would be but I wanted to mention 
> > this.
> >
> > I'm interested in knowing your thoughts on this.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Rahul Padmanabhan

Reply via email to