On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 20:23, Andrzej Bialecki <a...@getopt.org> wrote:
> On 2010-06-28 17:57, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > > Hi Doğacan, > > > > So your proposition is to combine (a) and (b) then? That’s fine by me, > > so long as there are no objections from others. I can still move forward > > with , (e) and (g) then... > > > No objections from me - but IMHO to satisfy the legal minds you still > need to produce a patch and attach to an issue with the "Grant to ASF" > checkbox marked... > > OK, I'll create a new issue in JIRA, and then attach a lot of patches :) I'll try to appropriately mark patches that are straightforward ports from nutch 1.1 into nutchbase so that the same committers can commit those patches _again_ hopefully preserving post nutch 1.0 history as much as possible. > (Also, I always shudder when I imagine a massive merge failing ... but > that's probably a leftover from my CVS days when a failed merge would > leave a completely broken tree.. ah, well, good luck :) ). > > I regularly do large merges in git and it works beautifully. We'll see how well SVN does :) > > -- > Best regards, > Andrzej Bialecki <>< > ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________ > [__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web > ___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration > http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com > > -- Doğacan Güney
