Hey Doğacan, >> This could go either way, whichever is more convenient - I don't see it as >> something to necessarily withhold the merge. Without the first issue, though, >> we lose the ability to develop, test and run in local mode... >> > > While I agree with the "table per fetch" issue, I would like to postpone it > until after the merge. This issue is tricky for a couple of reasons. For > example, AFAIK, cassandra's latest released version > does not support live schema updates so you can not add/delete tables on a > running cassandra machine. > [...]
I read this too, here: http://nosql.mypopescu.com/post/789235609/cassandra-and-hbase-compared Cheers, Chris ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
