[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12898652#action_12898652
]
Chris A. Mattmann commented on NUTCH-887:
-----------------------------------------
bq. There is something missing in Tika, and it's the support for compound
documents, but it's not likely to be added in 0.8
Huh, what do you mean? Nick just added a bunch of code to handle Compound
document detection, and parsing, see TIKA-447 and the discussions on the wiki
here: http://wiki.apache.org/tika/MetadataDiscussion. It may not be complete
yet, but neither is 0.8.
bq. I'd keep the "feed" plugin around for a while still, as an interim solution
until Tika supports compound documents. +1 to getting rid of parse-rss.
+1, I agree, but I still believe our goal should be to delegate this to Tika.
I'm starting to feel the creep of parsing plugins make their way back into
Nutch instead of just jumping over into Tika and working the process over
there. In the end, if we start to add back all the parsing plugins, I'm not
sure we've accomplished our goal...
> Delegate parsing of feeds to Tika
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: NUTCH-887
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-887
> Project: Nutch
> Issue Type: Wish
> Components: parser
> Affects Versions: 2.0
> Reporter: Julien Nioche
> Fix For: 2.0
>
>
> [Starting a new thread from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-874]
> One of the plugins which hasn't been ported yet is the feed parser. We could
> rely on the one we recently added to Tika, knowing that there is a
> substantial difference in the sense that the Tika feed parser generates a
> simple XHTML representation of the document where the feeds are simply
> represented as anchors whereas the Nutch version created new documents for
> each feed.
> There is also the parse-rss plugin in Nutch which is quite similar - what's
> the difference with the feed one again? Since the Tika parser would handle
> all sorts of feed formats why not simply rely on it?
> Any thoughts on this?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
