[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12900285#action_12900285
 ] 

Andrzej Bialecki  commented on NUTCH-891:
-----------------------------------------

bq. So, your point is [..]

Yes, that's exactly my point.

bq. I'd say, why not make the Gora Ant build publish a gora-0.1-<some snapshot 
id aka SVN rev or UUID or whatever>.jar?

Sure, that would solve the problem for now - I'll bother the Gora devs, and you 
can create the patch, ok? :) Ultimately we should go with the other solution 
(publish to Maven), but it requires more involvement from Gora devs.

bq. I'm not trying to be difficult about NUTCH-873 ...

Neither am I, no egos here - I just find the current situation after the fix to 
be intractable, especially when doing bugfixing and testing - because even if 
APIs stay the same, hidden bugs may not be the same across revisions...

> Nutch build should not depend on unversioned local deps
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NUTCH-891
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-891
>             Project: Nutch
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Andrzej Bialecki 
>
> The fix in NUTCH-873 introduces an unknown variable to the build process. 
> Since local ivy artifacts are unversioned, different people that install Gora 
> jars at different points in time will use the same artifact id but in fact 
> the artifacts (jars) will differ because they will come from different 
> revisions of Gora sources. Therefore Nutch builds based on the same svn rev. 
> won't be repeatable across different environments.
> As much as it pains the ivy purists ;) until Gora publishes versioned 
> artifacts I'd like to revert the fix in NUTCH-873 and add again Gora jars 
> built from a known external rev. We can add a README that contains commit id 
> from Gora.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to