Yeah your right Markus, I realise this. What about the tests and the problem with the build. What kind of behaviour are you getting?
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Markus Jelsma <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Some more problems here... >> >> Firstly, when I apply NUTCH-1237, I am seeing a mountain of javac >> warnings ranging right the way through from deprecation such as >> >> [javac] Compiling 169 source files to >> /home/lewis/ASF/trunk/build/classes [javac] warning: [path] bad path >> element >> "/home/lewis/ASF/trunk/build/lib/activation.jar": no such file or >> directory >> [javac] CrawlDbReader.java:36: warning: [deprecation] >> org.apache.hadoop.io.Closeable in org.apache.hadoop.io has been >> deprecated >> [javac] import org.apache.hadoop.io.Closeable; >> >> to >> >> [javac] URLNormalizers.java:103: warning: [unchecked] unchecked >> conversion [javac] found : java.util.List >> [javac] required: java.util.List<org.apache.nutch.plugin.Extension> >> [javac] private final List<Extension> EMPTY_EXTENSION_LIST = >> Collections.EMPTY_LIST; >> >> to >> >> [javac] CrawlDbReader.java:179: warning: [cast] redundant cast to >> org.apache.hadoop.io.Text >> [javac] String k = ((Text)key).toString(); >> [javac] ^ >> >> This relates back to my reasoning for opening NUTCH-1176, there seem >> to be quite a few issues here, just to confirm, I'm using trunk @ >> revision 1225183 (nightly). >> >> Further to this, I have two failing tests TestCrawlDBMerger and >> TestSegmentMerger... > > That's nothing new and has been going on for quite some time. > >> >> Can anyone confirm any of this so I can rule out my local environment >> messing things up? >> >> Thanks >> >> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi Andrzej, >> > >> > Can anyone confirm? I've tried this patch locally and although I >> > couldn't reproduce the original issue, it seems to be working fine for >> > me as well. >> > >> > Thanks Andrzej >> > >> > On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Andrzej Bialecki <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 28/12/2011 12:00, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote: >> >>> Hi Guys, >> >>> >> >>> Pretty strange compilation failure, this test class hasn't been hacked >> >>> in months, and from the surface, having looked at the test case there >> >>> appears to be no obvious reasons for it failing to compile. I've kick >> >>> started another build on Jenkins to see if it will resolve itself. >> >> >> >> I don't think it will - I can reproduce this failure locally. Here's >> >> what fixed the failure for me (I'm pretty ignorant about ivy/maven so >> >> there's likely a more correct fix for this): >> >> >> >> Index: ivy/ivy.xml >> >> =================================================================== >> >> --- ivy/ivy.xml (revision 1225046) >> >> +++ ivy/ivy.xml (working copy) >> >> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ >> >> <!--Configuration: test --> >> >> >> >> <!--artifacts needed for testing --> >> >> - <dependency org="junit" name="junit" rev="3.8.1" >> >> conf="test->default" /> >> >> + <dependency org="junit" name="junit" rev="3.8.1" >> >> conf="*->default" /> >> >> <dependency org="org.apache.hadoop" name="hadoop-test" >> >> rev="0.20.205.0" >> >> conf="test->default" /> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Best regards, >> >> Andrzej Bialecki <>< >> >> ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________ >> >> [__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web >> >> ___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration >> >> http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com >> > >> > -- >> > Lewis -- Lewis
