Sounds great!
-----Original message----- > From:Lewis John Mcgibbney <[email protected]> > Sent: Tue 22-May-2012 13:43 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: 1.5 RC2 > > Hi, > > As I say, I am able to stick time in tonight to roll this RC, however does > anyone have a problem with me rolling the 2.0 RC tonight after the 1.5RC2? > > I would like to get them out the way saving me time during this week if > possible. > > Thanks > > Lewis > > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: > OK doke this sounds fine to me then. I will make the relevant commits to the > 1.5 branch then work at it later this evening. > > I'll make a new thread when the stuff is sorted out and we are ready to VOTE > on the new RC. > > Thanks > > Lewis > > > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Julien Nioche > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: > Hi Lewis, > > I am sure that Chris will have no problem with you doing the RC2. Chris? It > would be a good thing to have more than one person who knows how to do it > anyway :-) > Note that to generate a fresh pom.xml you need to > * get maven-ant-tasks-2.1.3.jar and put it in the ivy dir > * ant -lib ivy deploy > The resulting pom.xml file should reflect the content of the main ivy.xml. I > have committed some minor changes to the pom template in trunk, this will > need to be copied to the 1.5 branch as well. We recently discussed a move to > Maven, another option would be to manage the dependencies with the Maven Ant > task, which would save us the hassle of having to keep the ivy.xml and > pom.xml in sync. We'll see > > Thanks > > Julien > > > -- > <http://digitalpebble.com/img/logo.gif> > Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering > > http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/ <http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/> > http://www.digitalpebble.com <http://www.digitalpebble.com> > http://twitter.com/digitalpebble <http://twitter.com/digitalpebble> > > > > > -- > Lewis > > > > > -- > Lewis > >
