I'll have a pop later today Julien. The ant tar-bin tar-src zip-bin and zip-src targets need to be investigated. A resolution needs to be committed to branch-1.5 and trunk before I can re-run the RC.
nutchgora will reflect these changes but will come later. On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Julien Nioche <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi guys, > > Lewis, Chris : where are we on this? Any chance we could have a RC3 soonish > :-) ? > > Thanks > > Jul > > On 24 May 2012 22:02, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hey Guys, >> >> Post this weekend if we don't have RC3, I will be glad to spin it. >> >> Release management is a tough job. Thanks to Lewis for RC2 and >> happy to have his help and work with him to make RC3 (and others!) :) >> >> Just want to get a good 1.5 out the door and a good 2.0 out the door >> and take care of business. >> >> By the way let's collectively pat ourselves on the back. The Apache Nutch >> community is super strong, collaborative and fun right now and you guys >> all rock!! >> >> -C >> >> On May 24, 2012, at 9:01 AM, Julien Nioche wrote: >> >> > Hi Piet, >> > >> > Flagging the info in the Wiki which is either incorrect or outdated would >> > be useful in itself. Feel free to create a page to track this or comment >> > directly on the docs. No contributions are too small >> > >> > Thanks >> > >> > Julien >> > >> > On 24 May 2012 08:37, Piet van Remortel <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> >> Can I carefully suggest that things like the tutorial indeed get some >> >> attention in case of a new release. I found the learning curve quite >> steep >> >> in the beginning exactly because of outdated nature of the plethora of >> >> distributed information around. Wouldn't mind helping a hand, but I >> don't >> >> feel I know nutch enough to write docs. >> >> >> >> regards >> >> >> >> Piet >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Julien Nioche < >> >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hi Seb >> >>> >> >>> Moved to dev@ as more relevant >> >>> >> >>> [...] >> >>> >> >>>> - bin should only have the content of runtime/local/ >> >>>> What about runtime/deploy/, esp. nutch-1.5.job ? >> >>>> Does it mean to abandon runtime/{local,deploy}/ and >> >>>> place the content of runtime/local in the top level folder? >> >>> >> >>> "ant package-bin" suggests this. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> yes. This has been discussed previously. If we are to produce a bin >> >> version >> >>> it makes more sense to expose the local runtime. You need to recompile >> >> the >> >>> job to use Nutch in distributed environment anyway >> >>> >> >>> It would break the convention since 1.3. and contradict >> >>>> the tutorial. >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> The tutorial will need to be updated to reflect this change. You are >> >>> volunteering? >> >>> >> >>> Julien >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> * >> >>> *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering >> >>> >> >>> http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/ >> >>> http://www.digitalpebble.com >> >>> http://twitter.com/digitalpebble >> >>> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > * >> > *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering >> > >> > http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/ >> > http://www.digitalpebble.com >> > http://twitter.com/digitalpebble >> >> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. >> Senior Computer Scientist >> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA >> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 >> Email: [email protected] >> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department >> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> >> > > > -- > * > *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering > > http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/ > http://www.digitalpebble.com > http://twitter.com/digitalpebble -- Lewis
