+50 :) On Nov 29, 2012, at 8:32 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote:
> So in summary, > > We retain the legacy behavior and bump them ALL to 1.7 > > In the 1.7 development drive (if and when we can) we make an effort to act on > patched issues in an attempt to pick the low hanging fruit so to speak... if > such a thing exists. > > best > > Lewis > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Julien Nioche > <[email protected]> wrote: > Good idea! I suspect that most of them will be dating from a looong time ago > and it won't be such a straightforward task to apply them, however this would > be a good way of sorting them > > > > Additionally, may I suggest (and please shoot me down here if I sound > cheeky) that we make it a priority in the next development drive, to > harness the issues which are marked as patch submitted? It seems to be > a waste for such issues to be stagnating. I am conscious that this > comment may sound wide of me, this is not the intention, I do think > however that it would be nice to work our way towards Nucth releases > in a more strategic manner than we have been doing. Hopefully this > proposal is a step in the right direction. > > > > -- > > Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering > > http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/ > http://www.digitalpebble.com > http://twitter.com/digitalpebble > > > > > -- > Lewis >
