Thanks Julien, Looking carefully, it seems that the 2.x branch diverges from what's in trunk. Should I do two patches, one for trunk and one for 2.x?
Tristan On Dec 17, 2012, at 9:37 AM, Julien Nioche <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Something like NUTCH-$JIRA_ISSUE_NUMER_NutchversionNumber_revision.patch maybe? There conventions are not very strict on this :-) J. On 17 December 2012 16:41, Tristan Buckner <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Julien, Yes I can (once I get in). Ah ok I did not understand the naming conventions and thought each patch was just incrementing the last number. What should I call it? Tristan On Dec 17, 2012, at 6:15 AM, "Julien Nioche" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Tristan Can you open a new issue instead, mark it as an improvement and link to the original issue? BTW you patch name seems to contain '-2.1' but is for trunk which is misleading Thanks Julien On 14 December 2012 18:46, Tristan Buckner <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I added a patch to the already closed 1087 (replacement bash script for the crawler command)). Can someone reopen and take a look? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1087 -- Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/ http://www.digitalpebble.com<http://www.digitalpebble.com/> http://twitter.com/digitalpebble -- [http://digitalpebble.com/img/logo.gif] Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/ http://www.digitalpebble.com<http://www.digitalpebble.com/> http://twitter.com/digitalpebble
