[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1031?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13584824#comment-13584824
]
Sebastian Nagel commented on NUTCH-1031:
----------------------------------------
Hi Tejas, a test of NUTCH-1031-trunk.v2.patch in combination with
crawler-commons-2.0 shows:
- protocol.RobotRulesParser.main does not work properly:
** robotName is not filled properly by the <agent-name>+ arguments
** parsed rules are printed in the Object string representation (e.g.,
SimpleRobotRules@2c2f1921)
- testRobotsTwoAgents failed. However, the tests are quite complex: Shouldn't
we trust on the exhaustive tests by crawler-commons? A simple test may be
sufficient to test the basic functionality and, eg. agent names separated by
comma.
> Delegate parsing of robots.txt to crawler-commons
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: NUTCH-1031
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1031
> Project: Nutch
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Julien Nioche
> Assignee: Tejas Patil
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: robots.txt
> Fix For: 1.7
>
> Attachments: CC.robots.multiple.agents.patch,
> CC.robots.multiple.agents.v2.patch, NUTCH-1031-trunk.v2.patch,
> NUTCH-1031.v1.patch
>
>
> We're about to release the first version of Crawler-Commons
> [http://code.google.com/p/crawler-commons/] which contains a parser for
> robots.txt files. This parser should also be better than the one we currently
> have in Nutch. I will delegate this functionality to CC as soon as it is
> available publicly
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
