+1 from me
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:51 PM, Julien Nioche < [email protected]> wrote: > Apologies. I had seen only that the status had changed to closed but > removing the fix version definitely did the trick. > > +1 for releasing > > Thanks Lewis > > > On 21 June 2013 21:46, Lewis John Mcgibbney <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I merely removed the fix for version numbers for the issues. >> Anyone is free to amend the various issues and do this now. I am on >> mobile and Jira does not render well in my browser. >> Can you please see to this? >> Thank you >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Julien Nioche < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Lewis >>> >>> I don't think you got my comment. I was saying that won't fix is the >>> right >>> resolution for these issues but that the report should not include them. >>> In >>> the case of these issues ppl might get the wrong idea by looking at the >>> report and think that we included the mongodb related stuff in the next >>> release which we don't. >>> >>> J. >>> >>> >>> On 21 June 2013 19:41, Lewis John Mcgibbney <[email protected] >>> >wrote: >>> >>> > Hi Julien, >>> > Done, thanks for the attention to detail. >>> > I wonder if you got to check sigs as well? I have been dancing between >>> > machines and it would be excellent to verify. >>> > Thank you v much. >>> > Lewis >>> > >>> > >>> > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Julien Nioche < >>> > [email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > > Hi Lewis >>> > > >>> > > The release notes [ >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10680&version=12323281 >>> > > ] >>> > > list issues marked as won't fix which is probably not a great idea. >>> For >>> > > instance it lists >>> > > *- Port nutch-mongodb-indexer to Nutch* >>> > > which is a won't fix but people could get the impression that it has >>> been >>> > > committed. Would be good to fix it if we can. >>> > > >>> > > The code compiles and passes the test. +1 to release >>> > > >>> > > Thanks >>> > > >>> > > Julien >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > On 20 June 2013 22:48, lewis john mcgibbney <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > Hi, >>> > > > >>> > > > Please VOTE on the release of the Apache Nutch 1.7 artifacts. >>> > > > >>> > > > As always, we solved a bunch of issues: >>> > > > http://s.apache.org/1zE >>> > > > >>> > > > SVN source tag: >>> > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/nutch/tags/release-1.7/ >>> > > > >>> > > > Staging repo: >>> > > > >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachenutch-044/ >>> > > > >>> > > > Release artifacts: >>> > > > http://people.apache.org/~lewismc/nutch/nutch1.7/ >>> > > > >>> > > > PGP release keys (signed using 4E21557F): >>> > > > http://nutch.apache.org/dist/KEYS >>> > > > >>> > > > Vote will be open for at least least 72 hours. >>> > > > >>> > > > I would like to say a huge thanks all contributors and committers >>> from >>> > > far >>> > > > and wide who helped with this release. Another string to add to the >>> > Nutch >>> > > > bow. >>> > > > >>> > > > Best >>> > > > >>> > > > Lewis >>> > > > >>> > > > [ ] +1, let's get it released!!! >>> > > > [ ] +/-0, fine, but consider to fix few issues before... >>> > > > [ ] -1, nope, because... (and please explain why) >>> > > > >>> > > > p.s. here's my +1 >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > -- >>> > > * >>> > > *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering >>> > > >>> > > http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/ >>> > > http://www.digitalpebble.com >>> > > http://twitter.com/digitalpebble >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > *Lewis* >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> * >>> *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering >>> >>> http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/ >>> http://www.digitalpebble.com >>> http://twitter.com/digitalpebble >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> *Lewis* >> > > > > -- > * > * > Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering > > http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/ > http://www.digitalpebble.com > http://twitter.com/digitalpebble >
