[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13961236#comment-13961236
]
Hudson commented on NUTCH-1747:
-------------------------------
SUCCESS: Integrated in Nutch-trunk #2592 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Nutch-trunk/2592/])
NUTCH-1747 Use AtomicInteger as semaphore in Fetcher (jnioche:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/nutch/trunk/?view=rev&rev=1585196)
* /nutch/trunk/CHANGES.txt
* /nutch/trunk/src/java/org/apache/nutch/fetcher/Fetcher.java
> Use AtomicInteger as semaphore in Fetcher
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: NUTCH-1747
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1747
> Project: Nutch
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: fetcher
> Affects Versions: 1.8
> Reporter: Julien Nioche
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: NUTCH-1747-trunk.patch
>
>
> In Fetcher we currently use
> Set<FetchItem> inProgress = Collections.synchronizedSet(new
> HashSet<FetchItem>());
> as semaphore within the FetchItemQueues to keep track of the URLs being
> fetched and prevent threads from pulling from them. It works fine but we
> could use AtomicIntegers instead as all we need is the counts, not the
> contents.
> This change would have little impact on the performance but would make the
> code a bit cleaner.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)