[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14350079#comment-14350079
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NUTCH-1946:
---------------------------------------
Github user jeroenvlek commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/gora/pull/21#discussion_r25929774
--- Diff: gora-hbase/pom.xml ---
@@ -117,6 +117,18 @@
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.hbase</groupId>
+ <artifactId>hbase-common</artifactId>
+ <scope>compile</scope>
+ <exclusions>
+ <exclusion>
+ <groupId>org.slf4j</groupId>
+ <artifactId>slf4j-log4j12</artifactId>
--- End diff --
http://basementcoders.com/2010/05/maven-exclusions-not-always-inherited/
It depends. According to the link above, this exclusion actually causes the
other exclusions in the main pom.xml to be *included* again. Is that on
purpose? Do we then still need the other exclusions in the parent pom.xml?
My knowledge of Maven runs a bit short here. The difference with the
example in the link above, is that in the parent pom one exclusion is stated
in a dependency management section, and the child pom just states its
dependencies.
> Upgrade to Gora 0.6.1
> ---------------------
>
> Key: NUTCH-1946
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1946
> Project: Nutch
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: storage
> Affects Versions: 2.3.1
> Reporter: Lewis John McGibbney
> Assignee: Lewis John McGibbney
> Fix For: 2.3.1
>
> Attachments: NUTCH-1946.patch, NUTCH-1946_Gora_fixes.patch,
> NUTCH-1946v2.patch, NUTCH-1946v3.patch
>
>
> Apache Gora was released recently.
> We should upgrade before pushing Nutch 2.3.1 as it will come in very handy
> for the new Docker containers.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
