[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-2049?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14700895#comment-14700895
]
Lewis John McGibbney commented on NUTCH-2049:
---------------------------------------------
Hi [~chrismattmann] please see NUTCH-1486. That patch should act as somewhat of
a prerequisite to sorting out the dependency soup issue which was introduced in
NUTCH-2038 via introduction of old mahout-core, mahout-cli and transitive
lucene-* dependencies which were defined within core ivy/ivy.xml as oppose to
ivy.xml at plugin level.
These dependency issues are proposed to be resolved in NUTCH-2056 however I've
resolved them within NUTCH-1486 so if anything I would suggest that if
[~asitang] could scope the latest NUTCH-1486 patch I've posted on NUTCH-1486
then this would be best use of his time.
For clarification the reason I've removed the plugin in the most recent patch
on this issue, is that the dependency soup is finally biting us on the back
side. It is now time to sort it out with a fix.
> Upgrade Trunk to Hadoop > 2.4 stable
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: NUTCH-2049
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-2049
> Project: Nutch
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: build
> Reporter: Lewis John McGibbney
> Assignee: Lewis John McGibbney
> Fix For: 1.11
>
> Attachments: NUTCH-2049.patch, NUTCH-2049v2.patch
>
>
> Convo here - http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40nutch.apache.org/msg18225.html
> I am +1 for taking trunk (or a branch of trunk) to explicit dependency on >
> Hadoop 2.6.
> We can run our tests, we can validate, we can fix.
> I will be doing validation on 2.X in paralegal as this is what I use on my
> own projects.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
