Hi Folks,
OK so VOTE'ing on the Apache Nutch 2.3.1 release candidate #1 is now
closed. It closed with the following results.

[ ] +1 Push the release, I am happy :)
Imtiaz Shakil Siddique
Chris Mattmann*

[ ] +0 I am not bothered either was

[ ] -1 I am not happy with this release candidate (please state why)
Lewis John Mcgibbney* (this release candidate has a flaw in the crawl
script)
Sherban Drulea (cannot get it to run... this release candidate has a flaw
in the crawl script))
Sebastian Nagel* (this release candidate has a flaw in the crawl script)

*PMC Binding

This VOTE therefore fails and it is (hopefully briefly) back to drawing
board for 2.3.1.
Thank you to everyone that VOTE'd.
Lewis

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi user@ & dev@,This thread is a VOTE for releasing Apache Nutch 2.3.1 RC#1.
>
> We addressed 32 issues in all which can been see at the release report
> http://s.apache.org/nutch_2.3.1
>
> The release candidate comprises the following components.
>  * A staging repository [0] containing various Maven artifacts* A 
> branch-2.3.1 of the 2.x code [1]* The tagged source upon which we are 
> VOTE'ing [2]* Finally, the release artifacts [3] which i would encourage you 
> to verify for signatures and test.You should use the following KEYS [4] file 
> to verify the signatures of all release artifacts.Please VOTE as follows[ ] 
> +1 Push the release, I am happy :)[ ] +0 I am not bothered either way[ ] -1 I 
> am not happy with this release candidate (please state why)Firstly thank you 
> to everyone that contributed to Nutch. Secondly, thank you to everyone that 
> VOTE's. It is appreciated.ThanksLewis(on behalf of Nutch PMC)p.s. Here's my 
> +1 [0] 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachenutch-1005[1] 
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/nutch/branches/branch-2.3.1[2] 
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/nutch/tags/release-2.3.1[3] 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/nutch/2.3.1[4] 
> http://www.apache.org/dist/nutch/KEYS
>
>
>
> --
> *Lewis*
>



-- 
*Lewis*

Reply via email to