[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-2455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Markus Jelsma updated NUTCH-2455:
---------------------------------
Description:
Citing Sebastian at NUTCH-2420:
??The correct solution would be to use <host,score> pairs as keys in the
Selector job, with a partitioner and secondary sorting so that all keys with
same host end up in the same call of the reducer. If values can also hold a
HostDb entry and the sort comparator guarantees that the HostDb entry (entries
if partitioned by domain or IP) comes in front of all CrawlDb entries. But that
would be a substantial improvement...??
was:??The correct solution would be to use <host,score> pairs as keys in the
Selector job, with a partitioner and secondary sorting so that all keys with
same host end up in the same call of the reducer. If values can also hold a
HostDb entry and the sort comparator guarantees that the HostDb entry (entries
if partitioned by domain or IP) comes in front of all CrawlDb entries. But that
would be a substantial improvement...??
> Speed up the merging of HostDb entries for variable fetch delay
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: NUTCH-2455
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-2455
> Project: Nutch
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: generator
> Affects Versions: 1.13
> Reporter: Markus Jelsma
>
> Citing Sebastian at NUTCH-2420:
> ??The correct solution would be to use <host,score> pairs as keys in the
> Selector job, with a partitioner and secondary sorting so that all keys with
> same host end up in the same call of the reducer. If values can also hold a
> HostDb entry and the sort comparator guarantees that the HostDb entry
> (entries if partitioned by domain or IP) comes in front of all CrawlDb
> entries. But that would be a substantial improvement...??
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
