[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-2496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16329760#comment-16329760
]
Moreno Feltscher commented on NUTCH-2496:
-----------------------------------------
Thanks again for clearing things up even more.
One last question about the "changing normalizers and/or filters" though: What
happens if I change let's say my filters and after that I do a full re-crawl
(inject - generate - fetch - parse - update - link inversion - index - index
cleanup) without having filtering turned on in my link inversion step? Would
Nutch take into account the new filters and eventually drop documents that do
not match the filters anymore from my index?
> Speed up link inversion step in crawling script
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: NUTCH-2496
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-2496
> Project: Nutch
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Moreno Feltscher
> Assignee: Lewis John McGibbney
> Priority: Major
>
> While working on a project where I have to index a huge number of URLs I
> encountered an issue with the link inversion step of the crawling script. A
> while ago Ian Lopata stumbled upon the same issue as described here:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/InvertLinks-Performance-Nutch-1-6-td4183004.html
> {quote}
> I am running the invertlinks step in my Nutch 1.6 based crawl process on a
> single node. I run invertlinks only because I need the Inlinks in the
> indexer step so as to store them with the document. I do not need the
> anchor text and I am not scoring. I am finding that invertlinks (and more
> specifically the merge of the linkdb) takes a long time - about 30 minutes
> for a crawl of around 150K documents. I am looking for ways that I might
> shorten this processing time. Any suggestions?
> {quote}
> Back then [~wastl-nagel] suggested turning off the normalizers and filters
> during the inversion step which speeds up the process a bunch.
> In my case however I kind of depend on those so this is no real solution.
> I opened this issue here in order to get some feedback on how we could
> improve things in a crawl script and speed up the process.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)