[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-2803?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17200142#comment-17200142
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NUTCH-2803:
---------------------------------------

balashashanka commented on a change in pull request #539:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nutch/pull/539#discussion_r492815616



##########
File path: conf/nutch-default.xml
##########
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@
 </property>
 
 <property>
-  <name>http.robot.rules.whitelist</name>
+  <name>http.robot.rules.allowlist</name>

Review comment:
       Hi @sebastian-nagel, I think that "allowlist" gives good context from 
user perspective. But since we still have to document and clearly explain the 
disadvantages. We can go ahead with http.robots.txt.ignore (or similar). 




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


> Rename property http.robot.rules.whitelist
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NUTCH-2803
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-2803
>             Project: Nutch
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: configuration, robots
>            Reporter: Sebastian Nagel
>            Assignee: Lewis John McGibbney
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.18
>
>
> As part of NUTCH-2802 the property {{http.robot.rules.whitelist}} should be 
> renamed.
> See the [definition of 
> http.robot.rules.whitelist|http://nutch.apache.org/apidocs/apidocs-1.17/resources/nutch-default.xml#http.robot.rules.whitelist]:
> bq. Comma separated list of hostnames or IP addresses to ignore robot rules 
> parsing for. Use with care and only if you are explicitly allowed by the site 
> owner to ignore the site's robots.txt!



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to