[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-2851?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17287054#comment-17287054
 ] 

Hudson commented on NUTCH-2851:
-------------------------------

SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build Nutch ยป Nutch-trunk #27 (See 
[https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Nutch/job/Nutch-trunk/27/])
NUTCH-2851 Random object created and used only once (#571) (github: 
[https://github.com/apache/nutch/commit/5250d62986468b23509a82d2aaa32bdc11cf02a8])
* (edit) src/java/org/apache/nutch/tools/DmozParser.java
* (edit) src/java/org/apache/nutch/indexer/IndexingJob.java
* (edit) src/java/org/apache/nutch/segment/SegmentReader.java
* (edit) src/java/org/apache/nutch/crawl/Generator.java


> Random object created and used only once
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NUTCH-2851
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-2851
>             Project: Nutch
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: dmoz, generator, indexer, segment
>    Affects Versions: 1.18
>            Reporter: Lewis John McGibbney
>            Assignee: Lewis John McGibbney
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.19
>
>
> In class org.apache.nutch.crawl.Generator
> In method org.apache.nutch.crawl.Generator.partitionSegment(Path, Path, int)
> Called method java.util.Random.nextInt()
> At Generator.java:[line 1016]
> Random object created and used only once in 
> org.apache.nutch.crawl.Generator.partitionSegment(Path, Path, int)
> This code creates a java.util.Random object, uses it to generate one random 
> number, and then discards the Random object. This produces mediocre quality 
> random numbers and is inefficient. If possible, rewrite the code so that the 
> Random object is created once and saved, and each time a new random number is 
> required invoke a method on the existing Random object to obtain it.
> If it is important that the generated Random numbers not be guessable, you 
> must not create a new Random for each random number; the values are too 
> easily guessable. You should strongly consider using a 
> java.security.SecureRandom instead (and avoid allocating a new SecureRandom 
> for each random number needed).
> This bad practice also affects the following
> org.apache.nutch.indexer.IndexingJob since first historized release
> org.apache.nutch.segment.SegmentReader since first historized release
> org.apache.nutch.tools.DmozParser$RDFProcessor since first historized release 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to