[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-3001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17764720#comment-17764720
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NUTCH-3001:
---------------------------------------

tballison opened a new pull request, #774:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nutch/pull/774

   …in the header
   
   Thanks for your contribution to [Apache Nutch](https://nutch.apache.org/)! 
Your help is appreciated!
   
   Before opening the pull request, please verify that
   * there is an open issue on the [Nutch issue 
tracker](https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NUTCH) which describes the 
problem or the improvement. We cannot accept pull requests without an issue 
because the change wouldn't be listed in the release notes.
   * the issue ID (`NUTCH-XXXX`)
     - is referenced in the title of the pull request
     - and placed in front of your commit messages surrounded by square 
brackets (`[NUTCH-XXXX] Issue or pull request title`)
   * commits are squashed into a single one (or few commits for larger changes)
   * Java source code follows [Nutch Eclipse Code Formatting 
rules](https://github.com/apache/nutch/blob/master/eclipse-codeformat.xml)
   * Nutch is successfully built and unit tests pass by running `ant clean 
runtime test`
   * there should be no conflicts when merging the pull request branch into the 
*recent* master branch. If there are conflicts, please try to rebase the pull 
request branch on top of a freshly pulled master branch.
   * if new dependencies are added,
     - are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for 
inclusion under [ASF 
2.0](https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)?
     - are `LICENSE-binary` and `NOTICE-binary` updated accordingly?
   
   We will be able to faster integrate your pull request if these conditions 
are met. If you have any questions how to fix your problem or about using Nutch 
in general, please sign up for the [Nutch mailing 
list](https://nutch.apache.org/mailing_lists.html). Thanks!
   




> protocol-selenium requires Content-Type header 
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NUTCH-3001
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-3001
>             Project: Nutch
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Tim Allison
>            Priority: Minor
>
> It looks like the selenium protocol requires that there be a content-type 
> header. 
> The logic seems to be: If the content type is html or xhtml, use selenium, 
> otherwise just grab the bytes.  
> However, with the current logic, if the content-type is null, nothing is 
> pulled.  
> My guess is that the logic should be : if the content type is not null and 
> equals html or xhtml use selenium, otherwise grab the bytes.
> Right?
> {noformat}
>       String contentType = getHeader(Response.CONTENT_TYPE);
>       // handle with Selenium only if content type in HTML or XHTML
>       if (contentType != null) {
>          if (contentType.contains("text/html")
>             || contentType.contains("application/xhtml")) {
>                readPlainContent(url);
>          } else {
> ...
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to