Sounds good to me 8-)
On 12/17/2019 5:36 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
So the discussion on legal discuss has died down [1] and the SGA has been
filled. My reading of that legal thread is that you now OK to transfer
everything across. Code not owned by the Nuttx project can be worked as needed
as everything is under a compatible license (BSD/MIT) and we have ICLAs (or
will soon do) from the major contributors. Given bitbucket is git under the
hood I’m not even sure we need to involve Infra and can just transfer the repos
across and history will still be preserved.
I would suggest we ask for a VM from infra to set up fossology [2] so we can
track all of the licenses / owners of the files. The will also help up build up
the LICENSE (and NOTICE) files. This process will take time but it doesn’t have
to be complete before you make you first release here and can happen in
parallel. One consideration may be that projects generally get one free VM and
we may want to use it for something else. It may be that other project will
want to use fossology and we get around it that way.
Does anyone has a different approach to suggest?
Thanks,
Justin
1.
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d58f8edd36eff155f061e84229dc035a71ea5cd7f0fa622bdd1a5dd0%40%3Clegal-discuss.apache.org%3E
2. https://www.fossology.org
