On Sun, Jan 5, 2020 at 4:38 PM Gregory Nutt <spudan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > But the recent commits that I was referring to are shown the same > > whether --date-order or not. > > Sorry, --date-order is the default, commit timestamp order. I meant > --author-date-order, author timestamp order. Summarized: > > $ git log > > commit 3951c4de5af427b204b77ae484fbd8175ed07842 > Merge: 7da409f3b5 9e091d2027 > Date: Sat Jan 4 07:58:30 2020 -0600 > > commit 7da409f3b53b4d2607b4551b059abb69ad3ad33b > Date: Thu Jan 2 17:22:08 2020 +0800 > > commit 9e091d2027a42fbec14555ae98c76e7579cd8b8e > Author: Mateusz Szafoni <raide...@railab.me> > Date: Sat Jan 4 09:44:00 2020 -0300 > > $ git log --author-date-order > > commit 3951c4de5af427b204b77ae484fbd8175ed07842 > Merge: 7da409f3b5 9e091d2027 > Date: Sat Jan 4 07:58:30 2020 -0600 > > commit 9e091d2027a42fbec14555ae98c76e7579cd8b8e > Date: Sat Jan 4 09:44:00 2020 -0300 > > commit 7da409f3b53b4d2607b4551b059abb69ad3ad33b > Date: Thu Jan 2 17:22:08 2020 +0800
Yes, now I see it. --date-order vs --author-date-order. <rant>Yet another example of git's horrendous user interface. Bottom-up design at its worst.</rant> Thanks for your help, Nathan
