my colleague worked on it https://developer.sony.com/posts/zerynth-provides-python-support-for-spresense-microcontroller-board-from-sony/
Regards Alin On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 5:16 PM Xiang Xiao <xiaoxiang781...@gmail.com> wrote: > Alin, > do you upstream your work? I can't find here: > https://github.com/micropython/micropython/tree/master/ports > There even has a zephyr porting. > It's greet if you can upstream nuttx porting to the mainline. > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 12:04 AM Alin Jerpelea <jerpe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > as a best practice instead of forking a project and maintaining it you > > should try to upstream the needed patches do that the project can be > built > > on top of NuttX. > > > > For reference you can check how microPython or circuit python are built > on > > top of NuttX without the need of forking the code > > > https://www.adafruitdaily.com/2019/10/29/circuitpython-snakes-its-way-to-the-sony-spresense-sparkfun-qwiic-micro-and-arduino-nano-33-ble-sense-python-adafruit-circuitpython-pythonhardware-circuitpython-micropython-thepsf-adafruit/ > > > > This way each project shares the maintenance on the parts that belong to > it > > > > Regards > > Alin > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 4:53 PM Gregory Nutt <spudan...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > >>> How about we host the active project porting on github.com/nuttx? > so > > > >>> the community could share the work. > > > >> The ideal solution would be to have the Pahu MQTT support NuttX > natively > > > >> in their code. Then you do not have to port it at all. We don't > want > > > >> responsibility for maintaining forks of other people's code. It is > a > > > >> large effort that takes a lifetime commitment. We have never done a > > > >> good job trying that in the past. > > > > i agree it's ideal. > > > > is there a "canonical" way for a software to have native nuttx > support? > > > > like having the top-level "debian" directory for debian packaging > stuff. > > > > > > You should talk to Alan Carvalho de Assis. It has been his dream for a > > > long time to get a NuttX package building system (like the original > > > Buildroot or OpenEmbedded) for NuttX. The apps/ directory build > > > framework might be a starting point but I don't think anyone has done > > > anything like that other than just talk about what a good idea it is. > > > > > > > > > > > > >
