Hi, Brennan,
I just created incubator-nuttx-apps PR 255 that should restore the
correct behavior:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/pull/255
This is a major bug and, if we release do a bugfix release sometime,
this should be included.
I was thinking the same. I created a label backport/9.0 that we can attach
to PRs that we think should be backported to a bugfix release. I suspect
especially with the amount of changes that went into this release it won't
be the only one.
> @btashton btashton added the backport/9.0 label 10 seconds ago
I agree that this should be backported. It is a major bug; a complete
loss of important functionality.
But let's let is simmer for a bit to make sure that it does the job and
doesn't introduce new issues.
Is this your preferred way of handling bugs? Adding the backport/9.0
tag? Optionally, we could just add the commits to the tip of the
releases/9.0 branch where they could be picked up at some later bugfix
release.
I have no preference. At some point, I think we also have to say that
9.0.x "is what it is". Or do you see us continuing to maintain the
release forever? In the dark, pre-Apache past, I had about a two week
period after the release after which it "is what it is". I distrubuted
patches up until that point. What policy would you recommend?
Greg
