> Do you think this is due to the.... I would say so.
I agree better debugging out of the box is a good way to go. We have to weigh that against the past goal of: Minimum size image. It was a first impression thing. This was why debug had to be tuned off in all Kconfig. The first question to ask is do we as a group feel still that the size of the canned config built images should be as small as possible to showcase NuttX ability to be small? David -----Original Message----- From: Matias N. [mailto:mat...@imap.cc] Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2020 5:18 PM To: dev@nuttx.apache.org Subject: Should TASK_NAME_SIZE be changed in most configs? While trying the integration of openocd with NuttX it was complaining due to "name" not being defined, which happens when CONFIG_TASK_NAME_SIZE == 0. Looking at sched/Kconfig the default for this symbol is 31, yet many configs have this set to zero. Do you think this is due to the default having changed at some point or is this done to minimize memory use in all these boards? If the latter, maybe we need to make the default depend on CONFIG_DEFAULT_SMALL and update all configs that do not have this set. Best, Matias
