Yeah usually when that happens in a fork it does not go well. Sipeed sent me a module via slow mail to support NuttX so hopefully that will arrive in the next week or so and I can start. Perhaps having work happening upstream will pressure them to do the right thing.
--Brennan On Sun, Nov 29, 2020, 6:10 AM Matias N. <mat...@imap.cc> wrote: > It seems Buffalo Labs will add support for NuttX on their own: > > < > https://github.com/bouffalolab/bl_iot_sdk/issues/1#issuecomment-734225337> > https://github.com/bouffalolab/bl_iot_sdk/issues/1#issuecomment-734225337 > > BTW, I'm expecting a BL602 from Pine64 (Pinecone) so at least I'll have a > module > to try it. > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020, at 13:37, Brennan Ashton wrote: > > For sure, I kind of recall a similar situation with the ESP modules, but > > then it looked better in practice. I kind of miss working on the Dialog > > parts for this, they are so low power. > > > > --Brennan > > > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020, 9:14 AM Matias N. <mat...@imap.cc> wrote: > > > > > If you can measure current consumption on sleep and idle, it would be > > > great. > > > The datasheet lists very high values. > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020, at 12:37, Brennan Ashton wrote: > > > > They are sending me some hardware in a couple weeks, so we shall see > what > > > > comes of it. > > > > > > > > --Brennan > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020, 8:04 AM Matias N. <mat...@imap.cc> wrote: > > > > > > > > > In case you missed it, there's a new RISC-V chip with BLE+WIFI > support, > > > > > clearly competing with ESP8266/ESP32. > > > > > The documentation and code is just starting to appear and the > company > > > has > > > > > given a good first step by asking > > > > > users about comments. You can find the issue here: > > > > > https://github.com/bouffalolab/bl_iot_sdk/issues/1 > > > > > Note NuttX being mentioned (most likely due to Brennan's offer to > add > > > > > support if Sipeeed can donate boards). > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > Matias > > > > > > > > > >
